Guideline | Resources |
Celiac Disease Dx and Mgmt: 2023 ACG Guidelines | epocrates Guideline Synopsis |
Key Points
Detection of celiac dz–specific Ab (e.g., TTG) is helpful for initial screening; intestinal bx is required in most pts to confirm dx. A non-bx strategy (TTG >10x ULN plus positive EMA in 2nd sample) may be used in selected children and adults unwilling/unable to undergo endoscopy.
Choose Patient Type
|
American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2023;118:59-76.
Epocrates Guideline Synopsis Last Update:
May 4, 2023
Publication Year:
2023
Source:
ACG
- American College of Gastroenterology
Strength of Recommendation
[S] | Strong recommendation |
[C] | Conditional/discretionary/weak recommendation |
[EvGap] | Evidence gap in recommendation |
Quality of Evidence
[H] | High-quality evidence—further research unlikely to alter confidence about efficacy |
[M] | Moderate-quality evidence—further research likely to affect future recommendations |
[L] | Low-quality evidence—further research very likely to affect future recommendations |
[VL] | Very low-quality evidence—any estimate of effect is very uncertain |
Abbreviations
abd | abdominal |
ALT | alanine aminotransferase |
AST | aspartate aminotransferase |
bx | biopsy |
Cu | copper |
DGP | deamidated gliadin peptides |
DM | diabetes mellitus |
DXA | dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry |
EGD | esophagogastroduodenoscopy |
EMA | endomysial antibody |
Fe | iron |
GFD | gluten-free diet |
IBS | irritable bowel syndrome |
IgA | immunoglobulin A |
IgG | immunoglobulin G |
QOL | quality of life |
T1DM | type 1 diabetes mellitus |
TTG | tissue transglutaminase |
TTGA | tissue transglutaminase antibody |
Zn | zinc |
Strength of Recommendation
S | = | Strong recommendation |
C | = | Conditional/discretionary/weak recommendation |
EvGap | = | Evidence gap in recommendation |
Quality of Evidence
H | = | High-quality evidence—further research unlikely to alter confidence about efficacy |
M | = | Moderate-quality evidence—further research likely to affect future recommendations |
L | = | Low-quality evidence—further research very likely to affect future recommendations |
VL | = | Very low-quality evidence—any estimate of effect is very uncertain |